<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE ArticleSet PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD PubMed 2.7//EN" "https://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/ncbi/pubmed/in/PubMed.dtd">
<ArticleSet>
<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>Islamic Propagation Office of Qom Seminary, Khorasan Razavi Branch</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Journal of Islamic Law and Jurisprudence</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2476-7565</Issn>
				<Volume>2</Volume>
				<Issue>4</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2017</Year>
					<Month>02</Month>
					<Day>19</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>A Critique on Interpreting Will Evidences in Jurisprudence</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>A Critique on Interpreting Will Evidences in Jurisprudence</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>45</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>68</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">64509</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.22081/jrj.2017.64509</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Rouhollah</FirstName>
					<LastName>Akhoondi</LastName>
<Affiliation>Payam-e Noor University of Tehran</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2017</Year>
					<Month>10</Month>
					<Day>12</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>&lt;strong&gt;A Critique on Interpreting Will Evidences in Jurisprudence&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; &lt;strong&gt;Abstract &lt;/strong&gt; &lt;br /&gt;As its nature depicts, &lt;em&gt;will&lt;/em&gt; is considered among the rare concepts raised in central and general topics of different social sciences such as law. Analyzing the legal identity of &lt;em&gt;will&lt;/em&gt; is infeasible given it is not studied in other sciences, namely, philosophy, Islamic theology, psychology and ethics. Specifically, we need to know that there is a significant relationship between the role of &lt;em&gt;will&lt;/em&gt; in such sciences and the legal and jurisprudential issue of &lt;em&gt;will&lt;/em&gt;. Analyzing &lt;em&gt;will&lt;/em&gt; with the help of such sciences is a novel phenomenon. Moreover, such an approach would end in a) getting to know the confinement of the &lt;em&gt;will&lt;/em&gt; &lt;em&gt;theory&lt;/em&gt; with the help of an ethical and a philosophical analysis of &lt;em&gt;will&lt;/em&gt; b) a better statement of rules and effects of &lt;em&gt;will&lt;/em&gt; and analyzing its defects with the help of a mental analysis of the &lt;em&gt;will,&lt;/em&gt; and c) justifying the stablished separation between intention and satisfaction with the theological analysis of the &lt;em&gt;will&lt;/em&gt;; an approach which states &lt;em&gt;will&lt;/em&gt; in its confinement framework comprehensively in one way and will not approach &lt;em&gt;will&lt;/em&gt; vs. ethics and other mandatory expediencies such as order as an omnipotent phenomenon on the other hand, contrary to the broad and dominant perspectives of the supreme Islamic jurists.</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">&lt;strong&gt;A Critique on Interpreting Will Evidences in Jurisprudence&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; &lt;strong&gt;Abstract &lt;/strong&gt; &lt;br /&gt;As its nature depicts, &lt;em&gt;will&lt;/em&gt; is considered among the rare concepts raised in central and general topics of different social sciences such as law. Analyzing the legal identity of &lt;em&gt;will&lt;/em&gt; is infeasible given it is not studied in other sciences, namely, philosophy, Islamic theology, psychology and ethics. Specifically, we need to know that there is a significant relationship between the role of &lt;em&gt;will&lt;/em&gt; in such sciences and the legal and jurisprudential issue of &lt;em&gt;will&lt;/em&gt;. Analyzing &lt;em&gt;will&lt;/em&gt; with the help of such sciences is a novel phenomenon. Moreover, such an approach would end in a) getting to know the confinement of the &lt;em&gt;will&lt;/em&gt; &lt;em&gt;theory&lt;/em&gt; with the help of an ethical and a philosophical analysis of &lt;em&gt;will&lt;/em&gt; b) a better statement of rules and effects of &lt;em&gt;will&lt;/em&gt; and analyzing its defects with the help of a mental analysis of the &lt;em&gt;will,&lt;/em&gt; and c) justifying the stablished separation between intention and satisfaction with the theological analysis of the &lt;em&gt;will&lt;/em&gt;; an approach which states &lt;em&gt;will&lt;/em&gt; in its confinement framework comprehensively in one way and will not approach &lt;em&gt;will&lt;/em&gt; vs. ethics and other mandatory expediencies such as order as an omnipotent phenomenon on the other hand, contrary to the broad and dominant perspectives of the supreme Islamic jurists.</OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Will</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">nature of will</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">defects of will</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">will and ethics confinements</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">http://jostar-fiqh.maalem.ir/article_64509_a494f50df92c45576b63ce7e6eeab2fe.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>
</ArticleSet>
