<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE ArticleSet PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD PubMed 2.7//EN" "https://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/ncbi/pubmed/in/PubMed.dtd">
<ArticleSet>
<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>Islamic Propagation Office of Qom Seminary, Khorasan Razavi Branch</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Journal of Islamic Law and Jurisprudence</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2476-7565</Issn>
				<Volume>7</Volume>
				<Issue>4</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2022</Year>
					<Month>02</Month>
					<Day>20</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Distinguishing the Effect of Ḍamīmah and Inḍimām in Intention of  Taqarrub</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>Distinguishing the Effect of Ḍamīmah and Inḍimām in Intention of  Taqarrub</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>161</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>194</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">67217</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.22034/jrj.2019.54513.1706</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Mohammad-Reza</FirstName>
					<LastName>Naeini</LastName>
<Affiliation>Teacher of Advanced Studies in Fiqh and Usūl at the Ḥawzah al-ʿIlmīyyah of Qom; mrnaeini47@gmail.com</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Mohammad</FirstName>
					<LastName>Hakim</LastName>
<Affiliation>Student of the Ḥawzah al-ʿIlmīyyah.of Qom and a PhD student in Jurisprudence and Principles of Islamic Jurisprudence, Farābī Campus, University of Tehran, Qom, Iran-Iran(Corresponding Author); khak_mohammad@yahoo.com</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2019</Year>
					<Month>06</Month>
					<Day>12</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>One of the most challenging topics in the field of &lt;em&gt;ibādāt&lt;/em&gt; (worship) is the analysis of the various types of &lt;em&gt;ḍamīmah&lt;/em&gt; (attachment) and the rulings of methods of &lt;em&gt;inḍimām&lt;/em&gt; (combining) the intention with &lt;em&gt;nīyyah&lt;/em&gt; of &lt;em&gt;taqarrub&lt;/em&gt; (intention to find proximity to God), which leads to the disruption of the nature of &lt;em&gt;nīyyah&lt;/em&gt; (intention) and the denial of correctness in devotional behaviour. This study, which uses an analytical-descriptive method, first, deals with the conceptualization of the intention of &lt;em&gt;qurbah&lt;/em&gt; (intention of drawing close to God), and considers the conjective motivation of the expression of servanthood as a criterion for the realization of the &lt;em&gt;nīyyah&lt;/em&gt; of worship. Then, it explains the differences between standard and sufficient &lt;em&gt;nīyyah&lt;/em&gt; in worship and the purity of intention necessary to attain the perfection of action. Next, it tries to explain the various types of &lt;em&gt;ḍamīmah&lt;/em&gt; and the methods of combining (&lt;em&gt;inḍimām)&lt;/em&gt; the intention to the &lt;em&gt;nīyyah&lt;/em&gt; of &lt;em&gt;taqarrub,&lt;/em&gt; and also to validate the views of the fuqahā (jurists) about the rules of &lt;em&gt;ḍamīmah&lt;/em&gt; and &lt;em&gt;inḍimām.&lt;/em&gt; In &lt;em&gt;fiqhī &lt;/em&gt;(jurisprudential) texts, analysis of the ruling of combining the intention of worship general causes which has no inherent contradictions with &lt;em&gt;ikhlāṣ&lt;/em&gt; (spiritual devotion), &lt;em&gt;has given rise to views&lt;/em&gt; such as, permissibility of such &lt;em&gt;inḍimām&lt;/em&gt; and the validity of action, denying the validity of devotional behaviour due to the non-realization of the exclusive and pure sincerity meaning, and detailed view based on methods of &lt;em&gt;inḍimām&lt;/em&gt; or preference of &lt;em&gt;ḍamīmah&lt;/em&gt;. Some opinions such as just losing the &lt;em&gt;thawāb&lt;/em&gt; (reward), the non-necessity of repeating the action, and also the invalidity of devotional acts and the need to perform it anew or make it up have been voiced regarding &lt;em&gt;ḍamīmah &lt;/em&gt;intention which is contrary to &lt;em&gt;ikhlāṣ,&lt;/em&gt; such as &lt;em&gt;rīyā&lt;/em&gt; (pretend virtuousness). The selected theory in this study is based on standard &lt;em&gt;nīyyah&lt;/em&gt; in worship which is obtained by analyzing the Qurʾānic and ḥadīthī documents in this field. This view is the opinion of the permissibility of &lt;em&gt;inḍimām&lt;/em&gt; and the validity of action in the &lt;em&gt;ḍamīmah&lt;/em&gt; of the first type, and the opinion of the invalidity of worship in &lt;em&gt;ḍamīmah&lt;/em&gt; of the second type in various styles of &lt;em&gt;inḍimām.&lt;/em&gt; Also, in attachment (&lt;em&gt;ḍamīmah)&lt;/em&gt; of the intention of other matters which are not in conflict with &lt;em&gt;ikhlāṣ&lt;/em&gt;, the opinion of absolute validity is accepted by refinement of the basis of a ruling.</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">One of the most challenging topics in the field of &lt;em&gt;ibādāt&lt;/em&gt; (worship) is the analysis of the various types of &lt;em&gt;ḍamīmah&lt;/em&gt; (attachment) and the rulings of methods of &lt;em&gt;inḍimām&lt;/em&gt; (combining) the intention with &lt;em&gt;nīyyah&lt;/em&gt; of &lt;em&gt;taqarrub&lt;/em&gt; (intention to find proximity to God), which leads to the disruption of the nature of &lt;em&gt;nīyyah&lt;/em&gt; (intention) and the denial of correctness in devotional behaviour. This study, which uses an analytical-descriptive method, first, deals with the conceptualization of the intention of &lt;em&gt;qurbah&lt;/em&gt; (intention of drawing close to God), and considers the conjective motivation of the expression of servanthood as a criterion for the realization of the &lt;em&gt;nīyyah&lt;/em&gt; of worship. Then, it explains the differences between standard and sufficient &lt;em&gt;nīyyah&lt;/em&gt; in worship and the purity of intention necessary to attain the perfection of action. Next, it tries to explain the various types of &lt;em&gt;ḍamīmah&lt;/em&gt; and the methods of combining (&lt;em&gt;inḍimām)&lt;/em&gt; the intention to the &lt;em&gt;nīyyah&lt;/em&gt; of &lt;em&gt;taqarrub,&lt;/em&gt; and also to validate the views of the fuqahā (jurists) about the rules of &lt;em&gt;ḍamīmah&lt;/em&gt; and &lt;em&gt;inḍimām.&lt;/em&gt; In &lt;em&gt;fiqhī &lt;/em&gt;(jurisprudential) texts, analysis of the ruling of combining the intention of worship general causes which has no inherent contradictions with &lt;em&gt;ikhlāṣ&lt;/em&gt; (spiritual devotion), &lt;em&gt;has given rise to views&lt;/em&gt; such as, permissibility of such &lt;em&gt;inḍimām&lt;/em&gt; and the validity of action, denying the validity of devotional behaviour due to the non-realization of the exclusive and pure sincerity meaning, and detailed view based on methods of &lt;em&gt;inḍimām&lt;/em&gt; or preference of &lt;em&gt;ḍamīmah&lt;/em&gt;. Some opinions such as just losing the &lt;em&gt;thawāb&lt;/em&gt; (reward), the non-necessity of repeating the action, and also the invalidity of devotional acts and the need to perform it anew or make it up have been voiced regarding &lt;em&gt;ḍamīmah &lt;/em&gt;intention which is contrary to &lt;em&gt;ikhlāṣ,&lt;/em&gt; such as &lt;em&gt;rīyā&lt;/em&gt; (pretend virtuousness). The selected theory in this study is based on standard &lt;em&gt;nīyyah&lt;/em&gt; in worship which is obtained by analyzing the Qurʾānic and ḥadīthī documents in this field. This view is the opinion of the permissibility of &lt;em&gt;inḍimām&lt;/em&gt; and the validity of action in the &lt;em&gt;ḍamīmah&lt;/em&gt; of the first type, and the opinion of the invalidity of worship in &lt;em&gt;ḍamīmah&lt;/em&gt; of the second type in various styles of &lt;em&gt;inḍimām.&lt;/em&gt; Also, in attachment (&lt;em&gt;ḍamīmah)&lt;/em&gt; of the intention of other matters which are not in conflict with &lt;em&gt;ikhlāṣ&lt;/em&gt;, the opinion of absolute validity is accepted by refinement of the basis of a ruling.</OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">nīyyah</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">intention of qurbat</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">standard of nīyyah</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">inḍimām to nīyyah</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">accidental ḍamīmah</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">the effect of ḍamīmah on nīyyah</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">http://jostar-fiqh.maalem.ir/article_67217_e4a14ee2a0943c8e6cb584012f9125f5.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>
</ArticleSet>
