Islamic Propagation Office of Qom Seminary, Khorasan Razavi Branch Journal of Islamic Law and Jurisprudence 2476-7565 6 1 2020 05 21 The comparative survey of Separation between Insolvency and Iflas Institutions and Its Effects in Jurisprudence and Law The comparative survey of Separation between Insolvency and Iflas Institutions and Its Effects in Jurisprudence and Law 151 179 68498 10.22034/jrj.2019.53325.1632 FA Ahmad Moballeghi misteress Majlis Islamic Studies Center, qom,iran Mohsen Vaseghi department of law Mohammad Mehryar Master of Mofid university, Qom, Iran. Journal Article 2019 01 25 The Insolvency and Iflas institutions has been discussed in Imamiya jurisprudence and other Islamic religions. The recognition of these two concepts is important because they both have been used in The laws of the Islamic Republic of Iran<br /> and regulations. In addition to insolvency and Iflas, another institution has been placed in law called bankruptcy. The legal basics of states, differs in terms of using these three institutions. The legislator institution has been forced to remove one of these two concepts from legal literature in Islamic Republic of Iran, because of the overlap between them. The question is how to interpret existing rulings about Iflas in other regulations such as the Civil law, after repealing of Iflas institution and its effects in 1935 by the legislator. There is three different methods for interpreting these regulations. It seems that the right method of interpreting these regulations, is to concentrate on their jurisprudential backgrounds The Insolvency and Iflas institutions has been discussed in Imamiya jurisprudence and other Islamic religions. The recognition of these two concepts is important because they both have been used in The laws of the Islamic Republic of Iran<br /> and regulations. In addition to insolvency and Iflas, another institution has been placed in law called bankruptcy. The legal basics of states, differs in terms of using these three institutions. The legislator institution has been forced to remove one of these two concepts from legal literature in Islamic Republic of Iran, because of the overlap between them. The question is how to interpret existing rulings about Iflas in other regulations such as the Civil law, after repealing of Iflas institution and its effects in 1935 by the legislator. There is three different methods for interpreting these regulations. It seems that the right method of interpreting these regulations, is to concentrate on their jurisprudential backgrounds http://jostar-fiqh.maalem.ir/article_68498_ce42fb865ad17055ef860518e4aaab20.pdf