Islamic Propagation Office of Qom Seminary, Khorasan Razavi Branch Journal of Islamic Law and Jurisprudence 2476-7565 8 4 2023 02 20 Assessment Validation of Non-Obvious Obligatory Significations with Emphasis on Aks al-Mustawwī and Aks al-Naqīḍ Assessment Validation of Non-Obvious Obligatory Significations with Emphasis on Aks al-Mustawwī and Aks al-Naqīḍ 43 73 73360 10.22034/jrj.2021.61737.2335 FA Abbasali Soltani Department of Jurisprudence and Principles of Law, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad Morteza Noroozi Department of Jurisprudence, Al-mostafa International Univeristy Hossein Naseri Moghadam Professor of Ferdowsi University of Mashhad Journal Article 2021 08 29 The usage of the madlūlāt al-iltizāmī (obligatory significations) of declarative and imperative sentences has long been the focus of the uṣūlīs and jurists. In Uṣūl al-Fiqh (principles of jurisprudence), obvious obligatory significations in its specific sense in a topic such as concepts and obvious in its general sense in ghayr al-mustaqilāt al-‘aqlīyyah (non-independent rational) has been proposed, and the validity and authenticity of this type of obligatory significations have been seriously discussed. But the other type, which is the non-obvious obligatory significations, despite its use in some of its types such as aks al-mustawwī and aks al-naqīḍ, less attention has been paid to their validity and authenticity. The purpose of this study is to answer the question of whether the validity and authenticity of non-obvious materials of sentences can be proven by emphasizing some of its types, i.e. aks. By using the analytical-descriptive method and presenting examples of reference to aks al-mustawwī and aks al-naqīḍ, this study aims to solve the challenges of their validity. In conclusion, by examining the ways of proving its authenticity and explaining the definite correlation, it has proved the validity of these items in some cases. The usage of the madlūlāt al-iltizāmī (obligatory significations) of declarative and imperative sentences has long been the focus of the uṣūlīs and jurists. In Uṣūl al-Fiqh (principles of jurisprudence), obvious obligatory significations in its specific sense in a topic such as concepts and obvious in its general sense in ghayr al-mustaqilāt al-‘aqlīyyah (non-independent rational) has been proposed, and the validity and authenticity of this type of obligatory significations have been seriously discussed. But the other type, which is the non-obvious obligatory significations, despite its use in some of its types such as aks al-mustawwī and aks al-naqīḍ, less attention has been paid to their validity and authenticity. The purpose of this study is to answer the question of whether the validity and authenticity of non-obvious materials of sentences can be proven by emphasizing some of its types, i.e. aks. By using the analytical-descriptive method and presenting examples of reference to aks al-mustawwī and aks al-naqīḍ, this study aims to solve the challenges of their validity. In conclusion, by examining the ways of proving its authenticity and explaining the definite correlation, it has proved the validity of these items in some cases.

http://jostar-fiqh.maalem.ir/article_73360_f1a51aaa8b1c1d0fead9f6a877822096.pdf