<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE ArticleSet PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD PubMed 2.7//EN" "https://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/ncbi/pubmed/in/PubMed.dtd">
<ArticleSet>
<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>Islamic Propagation Office of Qom Seminary, Khorasan Razavi Branch</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Journal of Islamic Law and Jurisprudence</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2476-7565</Issn>
				<Volume>9</Volume>
				<Issue>4</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2024</Year>
					<Month>02</Month>
					<Day>20</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>A Research into the Scope of the Principle of Sahlah and Samḥah Sharīʻah</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>A Research into the Scope of the Principle of Sahlah and Samḥah Sharīʻah</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>39</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>68</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">75283</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.22034/jrj.2022.63063.2402</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Hassan</FirstName>
					<LastName>Mahdavi</LastName>
<Affiliation>markaz feqhi aeme athar</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2022</Year>
					<Month>01</Month>
					<Day>25</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>The discussion of &lt;em&gt;sahlah&lt;/em&gt; and &lt;em&gt;samḥah (&lt;/em&gt;taking easy and simple) &lt;em&gt;sharīʻah&lt;/em&gt; is important. Because in different eras, especially our era, some have chosen the way of &lt;em&gt;tasāmuḥ&lt;/em&gt; and &lt;em&gt;tasāhul&lt;/em&gt; (making easy) in religious matters by citing this principle. According to this view, if it is difficult to perform a task, it is not necessary to comply with it, even if it does not cause stricture or harm. On the other hand, some jurists have taken great precautions in &lt;em&gt;fiqh&lt;/em&gt; and &lt;em&gt;uṣūl al-fiqh&lt;/em&gt; by relying on &lt;em&gt;ʻilm al-ijmālī&lt;/em&gt; (collective knowledge), the probability of punishment, the good perception of reality, and such issues. So that, no matter how we interpret it, the &lt;em&gt;sahlah&lt;/em&gt; and &lt;em&gt;samḥah sharīʻah&lt;/em&gt; will not find a place in &lt;em&gt;fiqh&lt;/em&gt;. By examining the evidence that indicates the &lt;em&gt;sahlah&lt;/em&gt; and &lt;em&gt;samḥah sharīʻah&lt;/em&gt;, it was found in this study that the most correct understanding of the meaning and concept of this principle is that this principle only has an external jurisprudential view. This study is in the position of a general comparison between all the laws of Islām and the laws of other religions and is not in the position of simplifying the rulings. Therefore, based on this principle, it is not possible to disprove rulings that are difficult for the &lt;em&gt;mukallaf&lt;/em&gt; (the one charged with a duty), but their difficulty does not reach the level of stricture or harm. The result of this study is used in many old and emerging issues, such as the issue of &lt;em&gt;hijāb&lt;/em&gt;, the issue of sex reassignment for those who are not compatible with their apparent gender, or the issue of embryo donation for couples who find it difficult not to have children.</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">The discussion of &lt;em&gt;sahlah&lt;/em&gt; and &lt;em&gt;samḥah (&lt;/em&gt;taking easy and simple) &lt;em&gt;sharīʻah&lt;/em&gt; is important. Because in different eras, especially our era, some have chosen the way of &lt;em&gt;tasāmuḥ&lt;/em&gt; and &lt;em&gt;tasāhul&lt;/em&gt; (making easy) in religious matters by citing this principle. According to this view, if it is difficult to perform a task, it is not necessary to comply with it, even if it does not cause stricture or harm. On the other hand, some jurists have taken great precautions in &lt;em&gt;fiqh&lt;/em&gt; and &lt;em&gt;uṣūl al-fiqh&lt;/em&gt; by relying on &lt;em&gt;ʻilm al-ijmālī&lt;/em&gt; (collective knowledge), the probability of punishment, the good perception of reality, and such issues. So that, no matter how we interpret it, the &lt;em&gt;sahlah&lt;/em&gt; and &lt;em&gt;samḥah sharīʻah&lt;/em&gt; will not find a place in &lt;em&gt;fiqh&lt;/em&gt;. By examining the evidence that indicates the &lt;em&gt;sahlah&lt;/em&gt; and &lt;em&gt;samḥah sharīʻah&lt;/em&gt;, it was found in this study that the most correct understanding of the meaning and concept of this principle is that this principle only has an external jurisprudential view. This study is in the position of a general comparison between all the laws of Islām and the laws of other religions and is not in the position of simplifying the rulings. Therefore, based on this principle, it is not possible to disprove rulings that are difficult for the &lt;em&gt;mukallaf&lt;/em&gt; (the one charged with a duty), but their difficulty does not reach the level of stricture or harm. The result of this study is used in many old and emerging issues, such as the issue of &lt;em&gt;hijāb&lt;/em&gt;, the issue of sex reassignment for those who are not compatible with their apparent gender, or the issue of embryo donation for couples who find it difficult not to have children.</OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Sharīʻah</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Sahlah</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Samḥah</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Negligence</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Taking Easy</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Stricture</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">http://jostar-fiqh.maalem.ir/article_75283_8ecd6135470b39c7f35ccf2fb11f127d.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>
</ArticleSet>
