عنوان مقاله [English]
Structuring the science of jurisprudence is developed based on logical necessary criteria. There are three criteria in this regards as the intellectual criteria, philosophy of jurisprudence and internal jurisprudence criteria for structuring jurisprudence. Logical criteria are the common and necessary ones for developing a structure. The criteria pertaining to the philosophy of jurisprudence are preferential ones, the jurisprudents have clarified using them. However, the internal jurisprudence criteria are preferential ones which are derived from jurisprudence. Having defined different criteria for structuring, the author has evaluated and investigated the internal jurisprudence criteria such as: comprehensiveness, inclusiveness, united basis, distinction of categorizations, coherence, objectivity, responsiveness in the area of logical criteria, criteria for the intention proximity, being mundane or pertaining to the hereafter, natural desirability, the goal of shariah legislation, corruption disposal and gaining benefit, preserving the shariah goals, humanistic communications, the life's natural stages, carnal forces perfectionism, human's needs, the right in the criteria for jurisprudential philosophy and the criteria for the assigned deeds type, subject type, rule type, the assigned guilds, the assigned person's status, the effects and requirements of the assigned person's deeds. Jurisprudential structures could be evaluated based on different criteria which are categorized under standards. Investigating the (non-)jurisprudential sources, the structing criteria are extracted.