Analysis of the rare jurisprudential opinion about Muslim Women's Hijab

Document Type : Research (Normal Review)

Authors

1 دانشجوی دکتری دانشگاه علوم اسلامی رضوی. مشهد.ایران

2 Professor Department of Jurisprudence Faculty of Theology

3 استاد تمام گروه فقه و مبانی حقوق اسلامی دانشگاه فردوسی.مشهد. ایران

Abstract

Analysis of the rare jurisprudential opinion about Muslim Women's Hijab
His article is a veil
The origin of the parenchyma is necessary, but there is no limit to the agreement of the existence of a menstrual cycle. Most of the scholars considered that it is obligatory to perform a full-fledged prosthesis with the exception of the face and limbs of the eye, as opposed to a rare eye. Aza Angha Shahrt is a proof of truth and perfection and the reason for the weakness and weakness of the rule of Astr, Berlusi Dalil and documents rare critical jurisprudence necessary to look Miersad. Noshta present in the footsteps of Dr. Sir Tarikhi responsible for Hijab and Shinasayi Arai Nadir Dur different roles, analyzed by Annah Pradakht. Barengende Achieved Achievement, Biangar Ansteke Diddagah, a famous theoretician in the field of theoretical and practical analysis, Dard et al

1. Hijab
2. Women's veils & Coverings
3. Judicial Opinions
4. Face and two palms
5. Women's prayer coverings & non-prayer coverings

Keywords

Main Subjects

Journal of Islamic Law and Jurisprudence
Volume 4, Issue 3 - Serial Number 12
December 2018
Pages 77-101

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics