Comparison between Uṣūlī and Fiqhī Deduction Method of the Sheikh Ansari in Authority of Celebrity of Verdict

Document Type : Metodology Of Studies

Authors

1 PhD Student of Jurisprudence and Basics of Islamic Law, Sistan & Baluchistan University. Zahedan- Iran

2 Associate Professor in Department of jurisprudence and Basics of Islamic Law, Sistan & Baluchestan University, Zahedan-Iran.

Abstract

The authority of the Celebrity of Verdict (al-Shuhra al-Fatwāʾiyya) is the topic of discussion between the scholars. Some have included examples from the works of the Shekh Ansari claiming that he has overtaken from his Uṣūlī method in regards to the Celebrity of Verdict. Then the reason for such an overtaking has been discussed. Some have proved his consideration in the closure proof (Dalīl al-Insidād) and considered his usage of the Celebrity of Verdict as using unconditional conjecture. Others have considered the reason as a psychological element that has made a great scholar such as the Sheikh Ansari to fall for a mistake as well. According to the findings of this article, which has used descriptive – analytical approach, aside from case studies of various examples and judgement of their verdicts, the two analyses mentioned here can be rejected; because the Sheikh denies the Celebrity of Verdict as an independent source. In another word there is no decisive reason for authority or devotional authenticity of the Celebrity of Verdict as an independent source. This does not have anything in contrary to the Celebrity of Verdict being used if the celebrity entails knowledge and certainty. It is because whenever the celebrity entails certainty, using it means using the certainty which itself is the common knowledge, rational authority and Shra’ī authority. Hence there is no disruption in Sheikh’s Uṣūlī view point and jurisprudential method.

Keywords

Main Subjects

Article Title [العربیة]

مقارنة بین منهجی الاستنباط الأصولی والفقهی للشیخ الأنصاری فی حجیة الشهرة

Abstract [العربیة]

إثبات حجیة الشهرة الفتوائیة هو موضع نقاش وخلاف بین العلماء، وقد ادعى بعض الباحثین بعد التتبع فی کلمات الشیخ الأنصاری وسرد عدد من النماذج أنه "رحمه الله" قد تخطى مسلکه الأصولی فی الشهرة الفتوائیة.
وأرجع هؤلاء سبب تخطى الشیخ هذا المسلک إلى أحد أمرین: فقد أثبت البعض أنّه "رحمه الله" انسدادی، واعتبروا أن تمسکه بالشهرة هو من باب التمسک بمطلق الظن.واعتبر البعض الآخر أن العنصر النفسی هو منشأ هذا التهافت، والذی أثّر على فقیه کبیر کالشیخ الأنصاری "رحمه الله".وفقًا لنتائج هذه المقالة، التی انتهجت الأسلوب الوصفی التحلیلی، بغض النظر عن ما یمکن قوله حول کل واحد من الشواهد والنماذج المذکورة وصحة أو عدم صحة فهمها، فإنّ التحلیلین المذکورین غیر صحیحین؛ لأنّ الشیخ الأنصاری"ره" ینکر حجیة الشهرة کدلیل مستقل؛ أی أنّه لا یوجد دلیل قطعی على حجیة الشهرة واعتبارها التعبدی کدلیل مستقل، وهذا لا ینافی إمکانیة التمسک بالشهرة اذا کانت مفیدة للعلم والاطمئنان؛ لأنّ التمسک بها فی هذه الحالة هو تمسک بالاطمئنان الذی هو علم عرفی وحجة شرعیة وعقلائیة، ونتیجة لذلک یثبت أنّه لا یوجد تناقض بین رأی الشیخ الأصولی ومسلکه الفقهی.

Keywords [العربیة]

  • الشهرة
  • العنصر النفسی
  • الانسداد
  • حجیة الاطمئنان
  • العلم العرفی

References

  1. al-ʿĀmilī al-Karakī, ʿ. I.-Ḥ.-M.-K.-M.-T. (1993/1414). Jamiʿ al-Maqāṣid fī Sharḥ al-Qawaʿid (2nd ed.). Qum: Muʾassasat Āl al-Bayt li Iḥyāʾ al-Turāth.
  2. al-Anṣārī, M. (.-S.-A. (1995/1416). Farāʾid al-Uṣūl (al-Rasāʾil) (5th ed.). Qum: Muʾassasat al-Nashr al-Islāmī li Jamāʿat al-Mudarrisīn.
  3. al-Anṣārī, M. I.-S.-A. (1992/1413). Kitāb al-Ṣawm. Qum: al-Muʾtamar al-ʿĀlamī Bimunasabat al-Ḍhikrā al-Miʾawīyya al-Thānīyya li Mīlād al-Shaykh al-Aʿẓam al-Anṣārī.
  4. al-Anṣārī, M. I.-S.-A. (1994/1415). Kitāb al-Nikāḥ. Qum: al-Muʾtamar al-ʿĀlamī Bimunasabat al-Ḍhikrā al-Miʾawīyya al-Thānīyya li Mīlād al-Shaykh al-Aʿẓam al-Anṣārī.
  5. al-Arākī, M. (1997/1375). Uṣūl al-Fiqh. Qum: Dar Rāh-i Ḥaq.
  6. al-Āshtīyānī, M. Ḥ. (1997/1429). Baḥr al-Fawāʾid fī Sharḥ al-Farāʾid. Qum.
  7. al-Ḥakim, a.-S. (1997/1418). al-ʾUṣūl al-ʿĀmma lī al-Fiqh al-Muqāran. Qum.
  8. al-Hāshimī al-Shahrūdī, a.-S. M. (1998/1419). Dirāsāt fī ʿIlm al-Uṣūl (Taqrīr Buḥūth al-Sayyid Abū al-Qāsim al-Khuʾī). Qum: Muʾassasat Dāʾirat Maʿārif al-Fiqh al-Islāmī.
  9. al-Ḥillī, Ḥ. I.-ʿ.-Ḥ. (1993/1414). Taḍhkirat al-Fuqahāʾ. Qum: Muʾassasat Āl al-Bayt li Iḥyāʾ al-Turāth.
  10. al-Ḥusaynī al-Shīrāzī, a.-S. (2006/1427). Bayān al-Uṣūl (2nd ed.). Qum: Dār al-Anṣār.
  11. al-Kāẓimī al-Khurāsānī, M. ʿ. (1997/1376). Fawāʾid al-Uṣūl (Taqrīrāt Baḥth al-Mīrzā al-Nāʾīnī). Qum: Muʾassasat al-Nashr al-Islāmī li Jamāʿat al-Mudarrisīn.
  12. al-Mūsawī al-Khuʾī, a.-S. A.-Q. (1973/1352). Ajwad al-Taqrīrāt (Taqrīrāt Baḥth al-Mīrzā al-Nāʾīnī). Qum: Maṭbaʿt al-ʿIrfān.
  13. al-Muẓaffar, M. (1996/1375). Uṣūl al-Fiqh. Qum: Muʾassasat Ismāʿīlīyān.
  14. al-Najafī, M. (1983/1404). Jawāhir al-Kalām fī Sharḥ Sharāʾiʿ al-Islām (7th ed.). (ʿ. al-Qūchānī, Ed.) Beirut: Dār Iḥyāʾ al-Turāth al-ʿArabī.
  15. al-Qaṭīfī, a.-S. ʿ. (1993/1414). al-Rāfid fī ʿIlm al-Uṣūl (Taqirīrāt Buḥuth al-Sayyid ʿAlī al-Sīstānī). Qum: Lītugrāfī-yi Ḥamīd.
  16. al-Qummī, a.-M.-Q.-M.-Q. (1958/1378). al-Qawānīn al-Muḥkama fī al-Uṣūl (2nd ed.). (R. Ṣubh, Ed.) Tehran: Maktabat al-ʿIlmīyya al-Islāmīyya.
  17. al-Sabzawārī, a.-S.-A. (n.d.). Tahḍhīb al-Uṣūl (2nd ed.). Qum: Muʾassasat al-Manār.
  18. al-Ṣadr, a.-S. (1997/1418). Durūs fī ʿIlm al-Uṣūl (5th ed.). Qum: Muʾassasat al-Nashr al-Islāmī li Jamāʿat al-Mudarrisīn.
  19. al-Subḥānī al-Tabrīzī, J. (2003/1382). Tahḍhīb al-Uṣūl (Taqrīrāt Baḥth al-Imām al-Khumaynī). Qum: Dār al-Fikr.
  20. al-Subḥānī al-Tabrīzī, J. (2003/1424). Irshād al-ʿUqūl ilā Mabāḥith al-Uṣūl. Qum: Muʾassasat al-Imām al-Ṣādiq.
  21. Ibn Manẓūr, M. (1993/1414). Lisān al-ʿArab (3rd ed.). Beirut: Dār al-Fīkr.
  22. Qudsī, A. (2007/1428). Anwār al-Uṣūl (Taqrīrat-i Durūs-i Shaykh Naṣir Makārim Shīrāzī). Qum: Madrasat al-Imām ʿAlī Ibn Abī Ṭālib.
  23. Shubiyrī Zanjānī, S. M. (1998/1419). Kitab-i Nikāḥ. Qum: Muʿassisi-yi Pazhūhishī-yi Raʾy Pardāz.
Islamic Law, Jurisprudence and Methodology
Volume 6, Issue 2 - Serial Number 19
Articles
August 2020
Pages 197-218

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 13 November 2019
  • Revise Date: 28 December 2019
  • Accept Date: 08 April 2020

Share

How to cite

Statistics