The Convergence of Sunnī Doctrines in the Interpretation of Shīʿah Jurisprudential Narrations

Document Type : Research (Normal Review)

Authors

1 Director of the Principles Department of the Fiqh Center of the Holy Imams (AS), and PhD in Fiqh and Fundamentals of Law from the University of Qom, Iran

2 Scholar at the Jurisprudential Center of the Holy Imams (AS), Qom, Iran.

10.22034/jrj.2025.70397.2909

Abstract

Rational evidence consistently influences the semantic interpretation of textual sources. Consequently, an awareness of the historical context in which ḥadīth were issued, as well as the prevailing social conditions, can provide critical insight for accurately understanding narrations. Some scholars, emphasizing the role of transmission contexts, argue that Sunnī jurisprudential doctrines influenced the formation of Imāmī narrations, thereby framing Imāmī jurisprudence as a derivative commentary on Sunnī jurisprudence. Conversely, others entirely reject the notion that Sunnī thought shaped the interpretation of Shīʿah traditions. 
This study employs an analytical-critical methodology, examining textual sources and expert opinions to demonstrate that neither of these two positions is entirely defensible. Historical evidence, along with the practical approaches of jurists throughout Islamic legal history—reflecting their established intellectual traditions—suggests that recourse to Sunnī jurisprudence is necessary only in cases where an Imāmī narration is ambiguous or excessively concise, and where such reference may resolve interpretive difficulties. However, when a narration possesses an independent and coherent apparent meaning (ẓāhir), external reference becomes unnecessary. This perspective is grounded in the principle recognized by rational thinkers (ʿuqalāʾ) that the mere possibility of an alternative interpretation does not invalidate the prima facie meaning of a text.

Keywords

Main Subjects


Article Title [العربیة]

دراسة قرینیة آراء العامة فی فهم روایات فقه أهل البیت «علیهم السلام»

Abstract [العربیة]

تؤثر القرائن اللبیة دومًا فی تشکیل ظهور الکلمات؛ وعلیه، یمکن الاستفادة من سیاق الصدور والأجواء الاجتماعیة السائدة کقرینة مهمة للفهم الصحیح للروایات
یرى البعض، بالنظر إلى تأثیر ظروف صدور الروایات، أن الآراء الفقهیة لأهل السنة مؤثرة فی ظهور الروایات الإمامیة، وعلى هذا الأساس، اعتبروا الفقه الإمامی بمنزلة الهامش على فقه أهل السنة. وفی المقابل، نفى آخرون أی تأثیر لآراء المخالفین فی فهم الروایات.
یکشف هذا البحث، الذی استخدم منهجًا تحلیلیًا نقدیًا من خلال مراجعة المصادر واستعراض آراء الخبراء، أن کلا الموقفین لا یمکن الدفاع عنه بشکل مطلق، فالأدلة المتاحة، وکذلک السیرة العملیة للفقهاء على مدار تاریخ الفقه - الکاشفة عن ارتکازهم العقلائی - تُشیر إلى أن الرجوع إلى فقه أهل السنة، خارج فرض تعارض الروایات، ضروری فقط فی الحالات التی تکون فیها الروایة مبهمة أو مجملة، ومع احتمال أن یؤدی هذا الرجوع إلى رفع الإبهام؛ أما فی الحالات التی یکون للروایة ظهور مستقل ومتناسب، فلا حاجة لمثل هذا الرجوع. یستند هذا الرأی إلى أن احتمال وجود قرینة منفصلة لا یمنع اعتبار الظهور عند العقلاء.

Keywords [العربیة]

  • الفقه الإمامی
  • استقلال الفقه الإمامی
  • هامشیة الفقه الإمامی
  • فقه أهل السنة
  • فقه العامة

به فایل PDF مراجعه نمایید.

Ibn Bābiwayh al-Qommī, Muḥammad Ibn ʻAlī (al-Shaykh al-Ṣadūq). 1992/1413. Man Lā Yahḍuruh al-Faqīh. Qom: Muʼassasat al-Nash al-Islāmī li Jmāʻat al-Mudarrisīn.
al-Anṣārī, Murtaḍā Ibn Muḥammad Amin (al-Shaykh al-Anṣārī). 2007/1428. Farāʼid al-Uṣūl. 5th. Qom: Majmaʻ al-Fikr al-Islāmī.
al-Ḥurr al-ʻĀmilī, Muḥammad Ibn Ḥasan. 1993/1414. Tafṣīl Wasāʼil al-Shīʻa ilā Taḥṣīl al-Masāʼil al-Sharīʻa. 2nd. Qom: Muʼassasat Āl al-Bayt li Iḥyāʼ a-lturāth.
al-Ḥillī, Ḥasan Ibn Yūsuf (al-ʿAllāma al-Ḥillī). 2000/1421. Mihāj al-Kirāmat fī Maʻrifat al-Imāmat. Mashhad.
al-Mūsawī al-Khumaynī, al-Ṣayyid Rūḥ Allāh (al-Imām al-Khumaynī). 2005/1426. al-Ijtihād wa al-Taqlīd. Tehran: Muʾassasat Tanẓīm wa Nashr Āthār al-Imām al-Khumaynī.
al-Ḥusaynī al-Sīstānī, al-Sayyid ʻAlī. 2019/1440. Al-Ribāʼ. Qom: Ismāʻīlīyān.
Shubayrī Zanjānī, Sayyid Mūsā. 2019/1398. Majmūʻah Āthār Āyatullāh al-ʻUẓmā Shybayrī Zanjānī. Markaz-i Taḥqīqāt Kāmpūtirī-yi ʻUlūm-i Islāmī.
Shubayrī Zanjānī, Sayyid Mūsā. 1998/1419. Kitab-i Nikāḥ. Qom: Muʻassisi-yi Pazhūhishī-yi Raʻy Pardāz.
ʻAlam al-Hudā, ʻAlī Ibn al-Ḥusayn (al-Sarīf al-Murtaḍā). 1969/1348. al-Dharīʻa ilā Uṣūl al-Sharīʻa. Tehran: Dānishgāh-i Tihrān (Tehran University).
Shūpāyī Jūybārī, Ḥusayn. 2019/1398. https://www.eshia.ir/feqh/report/asatid/Shopaei
Shahīdīpūr Zanjānī, Muḥammad-Taqī. Durūs al-Ustād. https://www.eshia.ir/feqh/report/asatid/shahidi
al-Ṣadr, al-Sayyid Muḥammad Bāqir. 1996/1417. Buḥūth fī ʻIlm al-Uṣūl. Muʼassasat Dāʼirat al-Maʻārif al-Islāmīyya.
al-Ṭabāṭabāʼī al-Burūjirdī, al-Sayyid Muḥammad Ḥusayn.1999/1420. Nihāyat al-Taqrīr. Qom: Markaz Fiqh al-Aʻimmat al-Aṭhār.
al-Ṭabāṭabāʼī, al-Sayyid Muḥammad Kāẓim. 2021/1400. Tārīkh al-Ḥadīth. 5th. Qom: Dār al-Ḥadīth.
al-Ṭabarsī, Abū Manṣūr Aḥmad ibn ʻAlī. 1965/1386. al-Iḥtijāj ʻAlā Ahl al-Lijāj. Al-Najaf al-Ashraf: Dār al-Nuʻmān lil Ṭibāʻat wa al-Nashr.
al-Ṭūsī, Muḥammad Ibn Ḥasan (al-Shaykh al-Ṭūsī). 1985/1364. Tahdhīb al-Aḥkām fī Sharḥ al-Muqniʻat lil Shaykh al-Mufīd. Edited by Sayyid Ḥasan Khurāsānī. Tehran: Dār al-Kutub al-Islāmīyya.
ʻAbdī, Muḥammad Ḥusayn. 2022/1401. Nishasht-i Istiqlāl-i Fiqh-i Imāmīyah. Qom: Markaz Fiqh al-Aʻimmat al-Aṭhār.
al-Fāḍil al-Lankarānī, Muḥammad. 1991/1370. Muṣāḥibih dar Faṣlnāmih-yi Ḥawzih, 43 & 44.
al-Kulaynī al-Rāzī, Muḥammad Ibn Yaʿqūb (al-Shaykh al-Kulayni). 2008/1429. al-Kāfī. Edited by Muʾassasat Dār al-Ḥadīth. Qum: Muʾassasat Dār al-Ḥadīth.
al-Kulaynī al-Rāzī, Muḥammad Ibn Yaʻqūb (al-Shaykh al-Kulayni). 1987/1407. Uṣūl al-Kāfī. Edited by ʻAlī Akbar Ghaffārī and Muḥammad Ākhundī. 4th. Tehran: Dār al-Kutub al-Islāmīyah.
Aḥmadī, Mujtabā and some of the Writers. 2009/1388. Chim wa Chirāq-i Marjaʻīyat. 2nd. Irān: Muʼsissih-yi Bustān-i Kitāb.
22. al-Majlisī, Muḥammad Bāqir (al-ʻAllama al-Majlisī). 1982/1403. Biḥār al-Anwār al-Jāmiʻa li Durar Akhbār al-Aʻimma al-Aṭhār. 2nd. Beirut: Dār Iḥyāʼ al-Turāth al-ʻArabī.
al-Majlisī, Muḥammad Taqī (al-Majlisī al-Awwal). 1985/1406. Rawḍat al-Muttaqīn fī Sharḥ Man Lā Yaḥḍaruh al-Faqīh. Qom: Bunyād-i Farhang-i Islāmī-yi Kūshanpūr.
al-Nūrī al-Ṭabrasī, al-Mīrzā Ḥusayn (al-Muḥaddith al-Nūrī). 1987/1408. Mustadrak al-Wasāʻil wa Mustanbaṭ al-Masāʻil. Qom: Muʼassasat Āl al-Bayt li Iḥyāʼ al-Turāth.