نوع مقاله : پژوهشی (داوری عادی)
نویسندگان
1 دانشجوی دکتری حقوق اسلامی دانشگاه علوم اسلامی رضوی. مشهد، ایران.
2 استادیار گروه حقوق اسلامی دانشگاه علوم اسلامی رضوی. مشهد، ایران(نویسنده مسئول)
3 دانشیار گروه علوم قرآن و حدیث دانشگاه علوم اسلامی رضوی. مشهد، ایران.
4 دکترای پزشکی و متخصص بیهوشی و مراقبت‌های ویژه دانشگاه علوم پزشکی مشهد
چکیده
کلیدواژه‌ها
موضوعات
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]
When the same rights of different people collide, finding the priority and arrangement between the fulfillment of these rights is a challenge that requires a fair solution to solve it. One of the cases of conflicts between rights occurs when the number of applicants for medical facilities exceeds the quantity or quality of those facilities. In this case, finding a priority for allocating these facilities while maintaining the health and life of transplant applicants is worthy of attention. This research, which is organized by descriptive-analytical method and with the use of documentary sources, seeks to provide solutions that will be used to remove the aforementioned challenge. In order to achieve this goal by referring to jurisprudential evidence and relying on wisdom, five possible solutions are explained below: Paying attention to the right of learning, having the most influential person in the society first, paying attention to the degree of dependence of maintaining the biological and religious system of the society on the life of the individual, benefiting from the rule of lottery and random selection of people. After explaining each of these solutions and their legitimacy, the shortcomings and inefficiencies of each of them have been explained. The achievement of the article is that the use of the lottery rule, compared to other solutions, has faced fewer challenges and the field of conflict and protest is much less than other solutions.
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
در دست اقدام ...
قرآن مجید
)