نوع مقاله: پژوهشی (داوری عادی)
نویسندگان
1 استادیار گروه حقوق مؤسسه آموزشی پژوهشی امام خمینی قم
2 مدرس خارج فقه و اصول حوزه علمیه قم و استادیار جامعه المصطفی العالمیه
3 دانشیار دانشکده حقوق پردیس فارابی دانشگاه تهران
چکیده
کلیدواژه‌ها
موضوعات
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]
Investigating the reasons and documentations of the Guardians Council in declaring some ratification against the shariah rules could wield remarkable influences in jurisprudential studies. The issue of extradition is among the ones whose related treaties have been declared against shariah rules by the Guardians Council. The different branches and subsidiaries of extradition and the Guardian Council's jurisprudential documentations such as "submission of a Muslim criminal to other countries under the issue of extradition" should be assessed and analyzed and its principles and sources should be studied. Having examined and analyzed the Council's Guardian documentations and argumentations in rejecting the ratifications of criminal extradition and jurisprudential reasoning regarding the primary ruling of a Muslim criminal extradition to Islamic and non-Islamic countries (except that of Nafyi Sabil), the researcher has highlighted that to sign contract of criminal extradition with non-Islamic countries could be considered as problematic given it is required to submit a Muslim criminal to infidels for execution or trial by the virtue of some primary jurisprudential rules such as the reasons for illegality of confirming infidel's judiciary system and the principle of "hormat I'aneh bar ithm". Thus, referring to Hodaybiyah Peace Treaty is not true for proving the permissibility of extradition.
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
)